Cost-effectiveness of shared telemedicine appointments in young adults with T1D: CoyoT1 trial

14Citations
Citations of this article
161Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Young adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) often struggle to achieve glycemic control and maintain routine clinic visits. We aimed to evaluate the societal cost-effectiveness of the Colorado young adults with T1D (CoYoT1) Clinic, an innovative care model of shared medical appointments through home telehealth. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Patients self-selected into the CoYoT1 (N = 42) or usual care (N = 39) groups. RESULTS Within the trial, we found no significant differences in 9-month quality-adjusted life; however, the control group had a larger decline from baseline in utility than the CoYoT1 group, indicating a quality of life (QoL) benefit of the intervention (difference in difference mean 6 SD: 0.04 6 0.09; P = 0.03). There was no significant difference in total costs. The CoYoT1 group had more study-related visits but fewer nonstudy office visits and hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS The CoYoT1 care model may help young adults with T1D maintain a higher QoL with no increase in costs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wan, W., Nathan, A. G., Reza Skandari, M., Zarei, P., Reid, M. W., Raymond, J. K., & Huang, E. S. (2019). Cost-effectiveness of shared telemedicine appointments in young adults with T1D: CoyoT1 trial. Diabetes Care, 42(8), 1589–1592. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-0363

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free