Cost effectiveness of different treatment strategies with natalizumab for pregnant women with multiple sclerosis

0Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The management of multiple sclerosis (MS) during pregnancy poses significant challenges. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of three natalizumab treatment strategies during pregnancy from the UK healthcare system’s perspective. Methods: A Markov model was developed to assess the health outcomes and costs associated with three treatment strategies: continuous natalizumab treatment throughout pregnancy, treatment until the first trimester followed by discontinuation, and discontinuation at conception with resumption post-pregnancy. The model incorporated data on relapse rates, disability progression, costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results: Continuing natalizumab throughout pregnancy was the most cost-effective strategy, yielding the highest incremental QALY gains and the lowest incremental cost per QALY (£1713 per QALY), with a net monetary benefit of £743. The sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings and the use of generic or biosimilar forms of natalizumab further reinforced the cost-effectiveness of continuous treatment, with the biosimilar option proving cost-saving. Conclusion: Continuing natalizumab treatment throughout pregnancy is the most cost-effective approach for managing MS in pregnant women. These findings should inform clinical guidelines and support healthcare providers and women with MS planning their family in making evidence-based decisions to improve the management of MS during pregnancy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Walbaum, M., Madhukar, A., Dobson, R., Cyhlarova, E., Castro-Aldrete, L., Santuccione Chadha, A., & Knapp, M. (2025). Cost effectiveness of different treatment strategies with natalizumab for pregnant women with multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology, 272(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12736-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free