Drying kinetics and thin layer modeling of ogi produced from six maize varieties at varying soaking period and drying temperature

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The drying kinetics of ogi produced from six varieties of maize at varying soaking period (12, 24 and 36 hrs) and drying temperature of 40, 50 and 60oC, respectively were studied. Seven common thin layer models were evaluated, and the best models were selected. The moisture content of ogi decreased with increased drying temperature and drying time while the drying rate increased with an increase in drying temperature and decreased with an increase in drying time. Logarithmic and two term models best fitted about 40.77% (22 samples each). However, where two term models were selected best, the R2 values ranged from 0.9858-0.99999999, χ2 = 0.03715-0.000412, RMSE = 0.02206-0.0000677, unlike Logarithmic model that ranged from 0.8876-0.9964, χ2 = 0.07045-0.001447, RMSE = 0.1084-0.01098. There was no definite pattern for effective moisture diffusivity (Deff) and Activation energy (Ea). This research work strongly suggests that the drying process was predominantly in the falling rate period (FRP) and was significantly affected by the change in temperature and moisture gradient. The activation energy obtained for ogi at varying soaking period and drying temperature ranged from 2.58-12.00 kJ/mol (A4Y), 7.72-44.95 kJ/mol (A4W), 14.53-35.88 kJ/mol (S7Y), 6.02-20.10 kJ/mol (D2Y), 14.024-45.31 kJ/mol (DIY) and 19.34-64.22 kJ/mol (T3W). It was obviously indicated in this research that the soaking period had less or no impact on the drying behavior of ogi compared with the influence of drying temperature, drying time and initial moisture content.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bolaji, O. T., Adepoju, P. A., Adelana, E. O., & Adesina, B. S. (2021). Drying kinetics and thin layer modeling of ogi produced from six maize varieties at varying soaking period and drying temperature. Food Research, 5(1), 431–440. https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.5(1).129

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free