A Daily Checklist Method Increases Documentation of Code Status in Trauma Patients

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: While insufficient code status documentation (CSD) is a longstanding challenge, all patients deserve the opportunity to participate in decision-making regarding code status, especially trauma patients with an unpredictable course. Prior interventions to increase CSD relied on reminder systems. We hypothesize that introducing a daily checklist will increase CSD for patients in the trauma ICU. METHODS: This quality improvement study examined the efficacy of a twice-daily checklist for improving CSD in trauma patients at a level I trauma center. A pre-intervention (PRE) and post-intervention (POST) daily census characterized the percentage of patients with CSD (primary outcome), time-to-code status (TTCS, secondary outcome) documentation, and information about patients who were discharged with no code status (DNCS, secondary outcome). RESULTS: Of 213 PRE and 207 POST, daily census CSD for all patients increased from a median of 50.0% PRE to 64.4% POST (P < .05). Time-to-code status was halved (PRE: 25.30 h, POST: 12.71 h, P < .05). Code status documentation within 12 h increased from 41.8% PRE to 60.9% POST (P < .05). Overall, the percentage of patients with CSD during their hospitalization increased 20% (PRE: 63.8%, POST: 83.6%, P < .05). Discharged with no code status patients decreased 20% (PRE: 35.2%, POST: 15.5%, P < .05). CONCLUSION: Including code status in a daily checklist involving key aspects of care for trauma patients is an effective method for improving code status documentation. Capturing code status for more patients in trauma allows us to provide patient-centered, goal-concordant care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bontrager, A. M., Ouadah, S. J., Anand, M., & Smith, M. C. (2024). A Daily Checklist Method Increases Documentation of Code Status in Trauma Patients. The American Surgeon, 90(8), 2092–2094. https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241241649

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free