Abstract
The Agenda 2030 recognises corruption as a major obstacle to sustainable development and integrates its reduction among SDG targets, in view of developing peaceful, just and strong institutions. In this paper, we propose a method to assess the validity of corruption indicators within an Item Response Theory framework, which explicitly accounts for the latent and multidimensional facet of corruption. Towards this main aim, a set of fifteen red flag indicators of corruption risk in public procurement is computed on data included in the Italian National Database of Public Contracts. Results show a multidimensional structure composed of sub-groups of red flag indicators i. measuring distinct corruption risk categories, which differ in nature, type and entity, and are generally non-superimposable; ii. mirroring distinct dynamics related to specific SDG principles and targets.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Gnaldi, M., & Del Sarto, S. (2024). Validating Corruption Risk Measures: A Key Step to Monitoring SDG Progress. Social Indicators Research, 175(3), 1045–1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03238-y
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.