Ultrasound as an alternative to conventional marination: Acceptability and mass transfer

38Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this study, the effects of ultrasound- (US-) assisted beef marination on consumer perception and the homogeneity of the solute and mass transfer were evaluated. Marinated and US-treated meat samples (40kHz, 11W/cm2 for 20, 40, and 60min, and storing at 4°C for 7d) were evaluated by a group of consumers using a structured 9-point hedonic scale of satisfaction. The preferences were analyzed with XLSTAT-Sensory® software. The analysis was performed in conjunction with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopic study to evaluate the sodium transference. The perception analysis indicated that the use of US-assisted marination did not increase the beef acceptability. The sonicated samples showed a more homogeneous distribution of sodium. However, traditional marination (TM) stored for 7d resulted in greater mass transfer than the US-assisted marination without storage.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

González-González, L., Luna-Rodríguez, L., Carrillo-López, L. M., Alarcón-Rojo, A. D., García-Galicia, I., & Reyes-Villagrana, R. (2017). Ultrasound as an alternative to conventional marination: Acceptability and mass transfer. Journal of Food Quality, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8675720

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free