Abstract
Central Thesis: Alan Wertheimer critiques David P. Bryden's subjective view of consent, arguing instead that consent should be understood as a performative act rather than an internal mental state. He posits that consent's power to morally transform actions, such as making them legally or morally permissible, is more effectively captured through external actions or communications. Wertheimer emphasizes that the validity of consent must consider contextual factors like coercion, deception, and intoxication, advocating for a nuanced legal approach that moves beyond simplistic "yes" or "no" frameworks. Legal/Academic Issues Addressed:-The nature of consent as subjective vs. performative.-The moral and legal implications of consent in sexual relations.-The impact of coercion, deception, and intoxication on consent.-Critique of the "No Means No" policy and its limitations.-The role of context and communication in determining valid consent. Methodologies/Data Sources:-Philosophical analysis of consent as a performative act.-Examination of legal cases and hypothetical scenarios.-Discussion of existing legal frameworks and their shortcomings.-Reference to scholarly works on consent and sexual relations. Findings/Analysis:-Consent is more effectively understood through actions rather than internal states.-Contextual factors significantly influence the validity of consent.-The "No Means No" policy oversimplifies complex communication dynamics.-Intoxication complicates the assessment of valid consent, requiring careful consideration of circumstances.-Legal frameworks must adapt to the nuanced nature of consent beyond simplistic models. Recommendations/Implications:-Adopt a performative understanding of consent in legal contexts.-Develop nuanced legal standards that account for coercion, deception, and intoxication.-Move beyond the "No Means No" policy to address complexities in communication.-Encourage a more comprehensive approach to evaluating the validity of consent in legal cases.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Wertheimer, A. (2000). What Is Consent? And Is It Important? Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 3(2), 557–583. https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2000.3.2.557
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.