Abstract
The conceptual foundations of burdens of proof are examined, and the unified theory of evidentiary devices derivable from those foundations is explicated. Both the conceptual foundations and the unified theory generated are shown to rest on questionable assumptions about conventional probability theory. The resulting analytical difficulties are analyzed. Inference to the best explanation and the relative plausibility theory are examined as potentially providing the foundation to a superior conceptualization of the burden of proof. © The Author [2014]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Allen, R. J. (2014). Burdens of proof. Law, Probability and Risk, 13(3–4), 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgu005
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.