Burdens of proof

35Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The conceptual foundations of burdens of proof are examined, and the unified theory of evidentiary devices derivable from those foundations is explicated. Both the conceptual foundations and the unified theory generated are shown to rest on questionable assumptions about conventional probability theory. The resulting analytical difficulties are analyzed. Inference to the best explanation and the relative plausibility theory are examined as potentially providing the foundation to a superior conceptualization of the burden of proof. © The Author [2014]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Allen, R. J. (2014). Burdens of proof. Law, Probability and Risk, 13(3–4), 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgu005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free