Endodontic Treatment versus Implant Placement for Compromised Teeth: Decision-Making Trends in Saudi Arabia

  • Bahabri R
  • Borzangy S
  • Taymour N
  • et al.
0Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The decision to save a compromised tooth is a major challenge among dentists and may vary among those with different areas of specialization. Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the influencing factors that play a role in decision-making trends when choosing whether or not to save a compromised tooth, either through endodontic treatment or extraction and implant placement. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a questionnaire was administered to a convenience sample to assess decision-making within different dental specialties among various dental schools in Saudi Arabia. Participants were stratified into four groups based on clinical specialties, including endodontists (n = 45, 23.9%), periodontists (n = 51, 27.1%), prosthodontists (n = 55, 29.3%), and oral and maxillofacial surgeons (n = 37, 19.7%). The data of 188 participants were nalyzed using Chi-square tests, with significance at p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bahabri, R., Borzangy, S., Taymour, N., Maddhar, A., Alkayyal, M., Alhazmi, W., & Taher, S. (2021). Endodontic Treatment versus Implant Placement for Compromised Teeth: Decision-Making Trends in Saudi Arabia. The Open Dentistry Journal, 15(1), 451–456. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210602115010451

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free