Abstract
Agents, some with a bias, decide between undertaking a risky project and a safe alternative based on information about the project's efficiency. Only a part of that information is verifiable. Unbiased agents want to undertake only efficient projects, but biased agents want to undertake any project. If the project causes harm, a court examines the verifiable information, forms a belief about the agent's type, and decides the punishment. Tension arises between deterring inefficient projects and a chilling effect on using the unverifiable information. Improving the unverifiable information always increases overall efficiency, but improving the verifiable information may reduce efficiency.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Kuvalekar, A., Ramos, J., & Schneider, J. (2023). The wrong kind of information. RAND Journal of Economics, 54(2), 360–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12440
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.