Comparison of the Flexural Strength of Three Different Aged and Nonaged 3D-Printed Permanent Crown Resins

  • Korkmaz Y
  • Buyuk S
  • Simsek H
  • et al.
14Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the flexural strength properties of three different aged and nonaged 3D-printed resins built by different 3D printing systems used in dental applications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bars (2 × 2 × 25 mm) were additively fabricated using a 3D printer and different dental crown resins (Saremco Crowntec, Senertek P-Crown V2, and Senertek P-Crown V3) per the manufacturers' recommendations. Each subgroup was divided into aged and nonaged subgroups (n = 10 bars per group). Thermocycling procedures (5° to 55°C; 5,000 cycles) were performed under favorable conditions for the aged subgroups from each material. Flexural strength (MPa) was measured in all samples using a universal test machine. RESULTS: When both aged and nonaged resins are compared, significant differences were found in flexural strength measurements (P < .001). The highest flexural strength was observed in the Saremco Crowntec group, while the lowest flexural strength was observed in the Senertek P Crown V2 group. The flexural strength measurements of Saremco Crowntec and Senertek P Crown V3 displayed no significant difference between their aged and nonaged groups (P > .05), while Senertek P Crown V2 (P = .039) showed significant differences between its aged and nonaged groups. CONCLUSIONS: Saremco Crowntec showed the highest flexural strength both in aged and nonaged groups, while Senertek P Crown V2 had the lowest strength. The artificial aging process decreased flexural strength values in all 3D-printed resin groups.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Korkmaz, Y. N., Buyuk, S. K., Simsek, H., & Abay, F. (2024). Comparison of the Flexural Strength of Three Different Aged and Nonaged 3D-Printed Permanent Crown Resins. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 37(7), S203–S207. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8987

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free