HOW POINTS-EXCHANGE INCENTIVES IN A CLOSED-LOOP SUPPLY CHAIN WEAKEN COMPETITION FROM THE INFORMAL RECYCLER

1Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To reduce the negative impact of informal recycling on the environment, we consider the competition in the recycling industry to explore the manufacturer's collection channel choice and the optimal points-exchange level. In this paper, a closed-loop supply chain model including a manufacturer and an informal recycler (IR) is constructed. Stackelberg game theory is used as a theoretical guide. In addition, we study the optimal decision problem under the profit maximization model. We find that the points-exchange offer increases the sales of new products and alleviates competition from IR. The manufacturer prefers to personally implement points-exchange activities to directly collect used products from consumers when the disposal revenue of IR is low. The manufacturer's exchange strategy forces IR to increase the acquisition price and face large cost pressure, which significantly reduces the collection quantity of IR. In the coordination problem, the revenue-sharing contract allows both the manufacturer and the third party to be in a winwin situation. We focus on the effectiveness of points-exchange incentives for manufacturers and third parties. Future research could explore the diversity of exchange offers by including government agencies in the closed-loop supply chain.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cheng, F., Chen, T., & Chen, Q. (2023). HOW POINTS-EXCHANGE INCENTIVES IN A CLOSED-LOOP SUPPLY CHAIN WEAKEN COMPETITION FROM THE INFORMAL RECYCLER. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 19(6), 4001–4021. https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2022120

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free