Nuremberg Revisited: The Tadic Case

  • Alvarez J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

AIM: The diagnostic accuracy of colonoscopic features in predicting colorectal cancer (CRC) malignancy was studied. METHOD: Consecutive patients who underwent first-time colonoscopy for lower gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms from 1998 to 2009 were identified. Gender, age, symptoms, endoscopic and pathologic findings were reviewed. RESULTS: There were 10,603 patients. The overall prevalence of malignancy was 3.0% (313). Among these, only 58% (181/313) had features indicative of tumour formation. The overall sensitivity and specificity was 9.6% and 94.1%, respectively. The overall positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio were 2.66, 0.96 and 2.77, respectively. CONCLUSION: A large proportion of Chinese patients with CRC presented without features indicative of tumour formation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alvarez, J. E. (1996). Nuremberg Revisited: The Tadic Case. European Journal of International Law, 7(2), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejil.a015512

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free