Meta-analysis and systematic review of colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection

89Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the proportion of successful complete cure en-bloc resections of large colorectal polyps achieved by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). METHODS: Studies using the EMR technique to resect large colorectal polyps were selected. Successful complete cure en-bloc resection was defined as one piece margin-free polyp resection. Articles were searched for in Medline, Pubmed, and the Cochrane Control Trial Registry, among other sources. RESULTS: An initial search identified 2620 reference articles, from which 429 relevant articles were selected and reviewed. Data was extracted from 25 studies (n = 5221) which met the inclusion criteria. All the studies used snares to perform EMR. Pooled proportion of en-bloc resections using a random effect model was 62.85% (95% CI: 51.50-73.52). The pooled proportion for complete cure en-bloc resections using a random effect model was 58.66% (95% CI: 47.14-69.71). With higher patient load (> 200 patients), this complete cure en-bloc resection rate improves from 44.19% (95% CI: 24.31-65.09) to 69.17% (95% CI: 51.11-84.61). CONCLUSION: EMR is an effective technique for the resection of large colorectal polyps and offers an alternative to surgery. © 2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Puli, S. R., Kakugawa, Y., Gotoda, T., Antillon, D., Saito, Y., & Antillon, M. R. (2009). Meta-analysis and systematic review of colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 15(34), 4273–4277. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.4273

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free