Comparison of morbidity between sentinel node biopsy and elective neck dissection for treatment of the N0 neck in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma

156Citations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has been proposed for staging of the cN0 neck in early oral/oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). Because SNB is a minimally invasive procedure, it is thought to be associated with less morbidity than elective neck dissection. Methods Sixty-two consecutive patients were included from 2000 to 2009. Two groups were analyzed consisting of 33 patients after SNB and 29 after elective neck dissection. Subjective impairment and functional shoulder status were assessed with the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII) questionnaire and the modified individual relative Constant Score. Postoperative complications were retrieved from the clinical charts. Results The investigated scores were significantly better in the SNB group. All postoperative complications occurred in the elective neck dissection group. Conclusion SNB is associated with significantly less postoperative morbidity and better shoulder function than elective neck dissection. This supports our opinion that patients with nodal negative early SCC of the oral cavity should be offered SNB. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2010 Copyright © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Murer, K., Huber, G. F., Haile, S. R., & Stoeckli, S. J. (2011). Comparison of morbidity between sentinel node biopsy and elective neck dissection for treatment of the N0 neck in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Head and Neck, 33(9), 1260–1264. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.21622

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free