Abstract
M ETROPOLITAN FRAGMENTATION, ur-ban sprawl, sustainable commu-nities, and " the new regionalism " not only are current buzzwords in urban poli-tics but also encompass central concerns about the viability of urban areas. Originally, the ur-ban reform movement primarily focused on efficiency and neutral competency. The issue of metropolitan amalgamation, 1 or consolida-tion, represents an interesting confluence of past and current dialogue about central urban concerns. The potential benefits of local gov-ernment amalgamation include increased ef-fectiveness and efficiency, increased equity, and reduced governmental overlap and frag-mentation. Moreover, consolidation has been seen as an antidote to the costs of urban sprawl. Little research has focused on the imple-mentation issues associated with consolida-tion. How consolidation affects the nature of governance for local residents, the quality and distribution of local services, and the political and administrative base is unclear.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Rosenfeld, R. A., & Reese, L. A. (2003). The Anatomy of an Amalgamation: The Case of Ottawa. State and Local Government Review, 35(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323x0303500106
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.