Inter-provincial variation and determinants of access to team-based primary care in Canada

  • Zygmunt A
  • Berge F
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Team-based care involves family physicians working with other health professionals to provide primary care to patients. It has been implemented across Canada; however, its adoption varies, as health care delivery is the responsibility of provincial governments and not the federal government. Objective: To examine variations in the composition of team-based primary care amongst Canadian provinces in 2008 and identify patient characteristics that may have predicted access. Methods: Data are from the 2008 Canadian Survey of Experiences with Primary Health Care, a national survey of patients’ experiences with primary care in Canada. The sample size available for analysis was 11,521 and the response rate was 70.8%. Team-based care was defined as a family physician working with either a nurse or another type of health provider. Logistic regression was used to examine determinants of access to team-based care, adjusting for demographic, health status, and socioeconomic variables. Results: In 2008, 37.1% of Canadians reported having access to team-based care. The composition of team-based care varied amongst provinces and the most common model in all provinces were family physician plus nurse-only teams except in Quebec and Manitoba. Statistically significant predictors of access to team-based care were province of residence and total number of chronic conditions. Conclusion: With continuity of primary care reform in Canada, a new national survey is needed. Future assessments should aim to increase accuracy in the definition of team-based care through improvements in survey question design and patient education.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zygmunt, A., & Berge, F. (2014). Inter-provincial variation and determinants of access to team-based primary care in Canada. Dalhousie Medical Journal, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.15273/dmj.vol41no1.5433

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free