Flood frequency analysis using historical data: Accounting for random and systematic errors

76Citations
Citations of this article
98Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Flood frequency analysis based on a set of systematic data and a set of historical floods is applied to several Mediterranean catchments. After identification and collection of data on historical floods, several hydraulic models were constructed to account for geomorphological changes. Recent and historical rating curves were constructed and applied to reconstruct flood discharge series, together with their uncertainty. This uncertainty stems from two types of error: (a) random errors related to the water-level readings; and (b) systematic errors related to over- or under-estimation of the rating curve. A Bayesian frequency analysis is performed to take both sources of uncertainty into account. It is shown that the uncertainty affecting discharges should be carefully evaluated and taken into account in the flood frequency analysis, as it can increase the quantiles confidence interval. The quantiles are found to be consistent with those obtained with empirical methods, for two out of four of the catchments. © 2010 IAHS Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Neppel, L., Renard, B., Lang, M., Ayral, P. A., Coeur, D., Gaume, E., … Vinet, F. (2010). Flood frequency analysis using historical data: Accounting for random and systematic errors. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 55(2), 192–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626660903546092

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free