Medico-legal rounds: Medico-legal issues and alleged breaches of "standards of medical care" in opioid rotation of methadone: A case report

15Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives. The objectives of this medico-legal case report were the following: 1) To present an example of a medico-legal problem that developed as a result of a decision to rotate a chronic pain patient (CPP) to methadone in order to taper the CPP from oxycodone; 2) To present both the plaintiff's and defendant's expert witnesses' opinions as to if and where the care of that patient fell below the "standard of medical care;" and 3) Based on these opinions, to develop some recommendations on how, in the future, pain medicine physicians and other physicians should proceed, in order to avoid allegations of breach of "standards of care" when using methadone. Methods. This is a case report of a CPP treated at a regional hospital pain clinic. Methadone rotation was used in order to taper the CPP from oxycodone because of addictive disease. Results. During the rotation process, the CPP expired. This had medico-legal consequences. Expert witnesses differed as to whether methadone caused the death. Conclusion. Pain physicians should proceed with caution in using methadone for opioid rotation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fishbain, D. A., Cutler, R. B., Cole, B., Lewis, J., Rosomoff, R. S., & Rosomoff, H. L. (2003). Medico-legal rounds: Medico-legal issues and alleged breaches of “standards of medical care” in opioid rotation of methadone: A case report. Pain Medicine, 4(2), 195–201. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-4637.2003.03021.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free