Abstract
Context: Certificate of need regulation was designed to control health care costs by preventing health care facilities from expanding unnecessarily. While there have been several studies investigating whether these regulations have affected health care investment, few have evaluated the relationship between certificate of need regulation and quality of care. Objective: To compare risk-adjusted mortality and hospital volumes for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery in states with and without certificate of need regulation. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study of 911407 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older, who underwent CABG surgery between 1994 and 1999 in 1063 US hospitals. Main Outcome Measures: States (and the District of Columbia) with continuous (n=27), none (n=18), or intermittent (n=6) certificate of need regulation; mortality (in-hospital or within 30 days of CABG surgery) rates; and mean annual hospital volumes for CABG surgery. Results: Unadjusted mortality was 5.1% in states without certificate of need regulation compared with 4.4% in states with continuous regulation, and 4.3% in states with intermittent certificate of need regulation (P <100 procedures annually) (30% vs 10% for states with continuous certificate of need programs; P
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Vaughan-Sarrazin, M. S., Hannan, E. L., Gormley, C. J., & Rosenthal, G. E. (2002). Mortality in medicare beneficiaries following coronary artery bypass graft surgery in states with and without certificate of need regulation. JAMA, 288(15), 1859–1866. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.15.1859
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.