Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) utilizes electrical coagulation, which can cause burns, fibrosis and adhesion of the stomach and surrounding tissue; these complications might increase the surgical difficulties for subsequent laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) and the risk of complications. However, scarce data are available on the influence of previous ESD on LAG. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of LAG following incomplete ESD in patients with early gastric cancer. Ninety-seven patients who underwent LAG were analyzed retrospectively; 17 patients had undergone ESD previously and the remaining 80 patients had no history of ESD. Clinicopathological data and surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups. No differences were observed in surgical outcomes of LAG after ESD in terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, total number of harvested lymph nodes, time until start of flatus, and postoperative hospital stay. These results were not influenced by tumor location and operative procedures. In conclusion, in terms of surgical outcomes, LAG is a safe and feasible procedure for the treatment of early gastric cancer regardless of previous endoscopic treatment. LAG may be the first-choice radical treatment after incomplete ESD for early gastric cancer.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Tsujimoto, H., Yaguchi, Y., Kumano, I., Takahata, R., Matsumoto, Y., Yoshida, K., … Hase, K. (2012). Laparoscopic gastrectomy after incomplete endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer. In Oncology Reports (Vol. 28, pp. 2205–2210). https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2012.2046
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.