Scientific Integrity Requires Publishing Rebuttals and Retracting Problematic Papers

7Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Recently, an article by Seneff et al. entitled “Innate immunosuppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs” was published in Food and Chemical Toxicology (FCT). Here, we describe why this article, which contains unsubstantiated claims and misunderstandings such as “billions of lives are potentially at risk” with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, is problematic and should be retracted. We report here our request to the editor of FCT to have our rebuttal published, unfortunately rejected after three rounds of reviewing. Fighting the spread of false information requires enormous effort while receiving little or no credit for this necessary work, which often even ends up being threatened. This need for more scientific integrity is at the heart of our advocacy, and we call for large support, especially from editors and publishers, to fight more effectively against deadly disinformation. Graphical Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barrière, J., Frank, F., Besançon, L., Samuel, A., Saada, V., Billy, E., … Robert, J. (2023). Scientific Integrity Requires Publishing Rebuttals and Retracting Problematic Papers. Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, 19(2), 568–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-022-10465-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free