Narrow-band imaging versus white light versus mapping biopsy for gastric intestinal metaplasia: a prospective blinded trial

80Citations
Citations of this article
77Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background and Aims Gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) is a gastric cancer precursor. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) may improve detection of GIM. We compared detection of GIM with high-definition white-light (HD-WL) endoscopy, NBI, and mapping biopsies in a population with increased gastric cancer risk. Methods Patients undergoing upper endoscopy had HD-WL examination by 1 endoscopist, followed by an NBI examination by a second endoscopist blinded to HD-WL findings. The location of abnormalities detected by HD-WL and NBI were recorded by a research coordinator, and targeted biopsies of abnormal areas were performed after NBI. Subsequently, 5 mapping biopsies were performed per patient. Biopsy specimens were read by a pathologist blinded to mode of acquisition. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with GIM. Results We enrolled 112 patients: 107 (96%) were Hispanic or Asian, and 34 (30%) had GIM. Higher proportions of patients with GIM were detected by NBI (22/34 [65%]) and mapping (26/34 [76%]) versus HD-WL (10/34 [29%]) (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Buxbaum, J. L., Hormozdi, D., Dinis-Ribeiro, M., Lane, C., Dias-Silva, D., Sahakian, A., … Laine, L. (2017). Narrow-band imaging versus white light versus mapping biopsy for gastric intestinal metaplasia: a prospective blinded trial. In Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (Vol. 86, pp. 857–865). Mosby Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2017.03.1528

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free