Neuraxial analgesia effects on labour progression: Facts, fallacies, uncertainties and the future

65Citations
Citations of this article
118Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Approximately 60% of women who labour in the USA receive some form of neuraxial analgesia, but concerns have been raised regarding whether it negatively impacts the labour and delivery process. In this review, we attempt to clarify what has been established as truths, falsities and uncertainties regarding the effects of this form of pain relief on labour progression, negative and/or positive. Additionally, although the term 'epidural' has become synonymous with neuraxial analgesia, we discuss two other techniques, combined spinal-epidural and continuous spinal analgesia, that are gaining popularity, as well as their effects on labour progression.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grant, E. N., Tao, W., Craig, M., McIntire, D., & Leveno, K. (2015, February 1). Neuraxial analgesia effects on labour progression: Facts, fallacies, uncertainties and the future. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12966

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free