Barking Up the Wrong Tree: How Political Alignment Shapes Electoral Backlash from Natural Disasters

19Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

While scholarship on “retrospective voting” has found that incumbent politicians can be punished for a range of events outside their control, the literature has paid scant attention to the role of political alignment between the different levels of government in disaster responses and its implications for voting decisions. We argue that retrospective voters punish only opposition incumbents (candidates in office but not aligned with the government leader), who have limited access to government resources for relief, for natural disasters. We use monthly data on precipitation and evaporation to capture droughts and floods in India’s four thousand State Assembly electoral constituencies over the years 1977–2007. Consistent with our hypothesis, we find that Members of State Assembly from the party of the Prime or Chief Minister do not face an electoral backlash under bad weather conditions during the monsoon season, whereas opposition politicians face major losses.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blankenship, B., Kennedy, R., Urpelainen, J., & Yang, J. (2021). Barking Up the Wrong Tree: How Political Alignment Shapes Electoral Backlash from Natural Disasters. Comparative Political Studies, 54(7), 1163–1196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020970211

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free