Multicenter study of banked third-party virus-specific T cells to treat severe viral infections after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

487Citations
Citations of this article
234Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Virus-specific T cell (VST) lines could provide useful antiviral prophylaxis and treatment of immune-deficient patients if it were possible to avoid the necessity of generating a separate line for each patient, often on an emergency basis. We prepared a bank of 32 virus-specific lines from individuals with common HLA polymorphisms who were immune to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus, or adenovirus. A total of 18 lines were administered to 50 patients with severe, refractory illness because of infection with one of these viruses after hematopoietic stem cell transplant. The cumulative rates of complete or partial responses at 6 weeks postinfusion were 74.0% (95% CI, 58.5%-89.5%) for the entire group (n 5 50), 73.9% (95% CI, 51.2% -96.6%) for cytomegalovirus (n 5 23), 77.8% for adenovirus (n 5 18), and 66.7% (95% CI, 36.9%-96.5%) for EBV (n 5 9). Only 4 responders had a recurrence or progression. There were no immediate infusionrelated adverse events, and de novo graft-versus-host disease developed in only 2 patients. Despite the disparity between the lines and their recipients, the mean frequency of VSTs increased significantly postinfusion, coincident with striking decreases in viral DNA and resolution of clinical symptoms. The use of banked third-party VSTs is a feasible and safe approach to rapidly treat severe or intractable viral infections after stem cell transplantation. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00711035. © 2013 by The American Society of Hematology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leen, A. M., Bollard, C. M., Mendizabal, A. M., Shpall, E. J., Szabolcs, P., Antin, J. H., … Heslop, H. E. (2013). Multicenter study of banked third-party virus-specific T cells to treat severe viral infections after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood, 121(26), 5113–5123. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-02-486324

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free