Semantics vs Syntax vs Computations: Machine Models for Type-2 Polynomial-Time Bounded Functionals

8Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper investigates analogs of the Kreisel-Lacombe-Shoenfield Theorem in the context of the type-2 basic feasible functionals. We develop a direct, polynomial-time analog of effective operation in which the time bounding on computations is modeled after Kapron and Cook's scheme for their basic polynomial-time functionals. We show that if P = NP, these polynomial-time effective operations are strictly more powerful on ℛ (the class of recursive functions) than the basic feasible functions. We also consider a weaker notion of polynomial-time effective operation where the machines computing these functionals have access to the computations of their procedural parameter, but not to its program text. For this version of polynomial-time effective operations, the analog of the Kreisel-Lacombe-Shoenfield is shown to hold - their power matches that of the basic feasible functionals on ℛ. © 1997 Academic Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Royer, J. S. (1997). Semantics vs Syntax vs Computations: Machine Models for Type-2 Polynomial-Time Bounded Functionals. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 54(3), 424–436. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcss.1997.1487

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free