Feasibility of rapid linear-endocardial and epicardial ventricular ablation using an irrigated multipolar radiofrequency ablation catheter

7Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background - A common strategy for ablation of scar-based ventricular tachycardia is delivering multiple lesions in a linear pattern. Methods and Results - We tested the efficacy of a novel linear irrigated multipolar ablation catheter capable of creating linear lesions with a single application. Healthy swine underwent endocardial and epicardial linear ablation using a novel linear irrigated ablation catheter; control animals underwent focal lesions in a linear pattern over 3.5 cm with an irrigated radiofrequency catheter. The linear catheter contained 7 irrigated electrodes spaced over 3.5 cm and could deliver ≤25 W to each electrode. Linear ablation required significantly less radiofrequency time than focal ablation (56±11 versus 497±110 seconds; P<0.0001). At gross pathology, linear (n=18) epicardial lines were longer than focal (n=8) epicardial lines (3.3±0.7 versus 2.1±0.9 cm; P<0.0005), with greater volume (3.8±2.9 versus 1.5±1.6 cm3; P=0.002). There was no difference between linear (n=22) and focal (n=7) endocardial line length or volume. Gaps (length 2.8±0.9 mm) were present in 53% of focal lines and 0% of linear ablation lines. No perforations, steam pops, or thrombus were noted. Conclusions - Compared with sequential focal radiofrequency ablation in a linear pattern, an irrigated multipolar linear ablation catheter safely delivers contiguous endocardial or epicardial lesions without gaps in a single ablation. This catheter shows promise for decreasing ventricular tachycardia ablation procedure time and improving outcome.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nazer, B., Walters, T. E., Duggirala, S., & Gerstenfeld, E. P. (2017). Feasibility of rapid linear-endocardial and epicardial ventricular ablation using an irrigated multipolar radiofrequency ablation catheter. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004760

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free