Two-group comparisons of zero-inflated intensity values: The choice of test statistic matters

17Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Motivation: A special characteristic of data from molecular biology is the frequent occurrence of zero intensity values which can arise either by true absence of a compound or by a signal that is below a technical limit of detection. Results: While so-called two-part tests compare mixture distributions between groups, one-part tests treat the zero-inflated distributions as left-censored. The left-inflated mixture model combines these two approaches. Both types of distributional assumptions and combinations of both are considered in a simulation study to compare power and estimation of log fold change. We discuss issues of application using an example from peptidomics. The considered tests generally perform best in scenarios satisfying their respective distributional assumptions. In the absence of distributional assumptions, the two-part Wilcoxon test or the empirical likelihood ratio test is recommended. Assuming a log-normal subdistribution the leftinflated mixture model provides estimates for the proportions of the two considered types of zero intensities. Availability: R code is available at http://cemsiis.meduniwien.ac.at/en/kb/science-research/software/.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gleiss, A., Dakna, M., Mischak, H., & Heinze, G. (2015). Two-group comparisons of zero-inflated intensity values: The choice of test statistic matters. Bioinformatics, 31(14), 2310–2317. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv154

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free