In defense of Plato's intermediates

5Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Once we realize that the indivisible and infinitely repeatable One of the arithmetic lesson in Republic7 is generated by διάνοια at Parmenides 143a6-9, it becomes possible to revisit the Divided Line's Second Part and see that Aristotle's error was not to claim that Plato placed Intermediates between the Ideas and sensible things but to restrict that class to the mathematical objects Socrates used to explain it. All of the One-Over-Many Forms of Republic10 that Aristotle, following Plato, attacked with the Third Man, are equally dependent on Images and above all on the Hypothesis of the One (Republic 510b4-8).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Altman, W. H. F. (2020). In defense of Plato’s intermediates. Plato Journal, 20, 151–166. https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-4105_20_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free