Del daño moral al daño extrapatrimonial: La superación del pretium doloris

18Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Considering the scope of its protection the violation of an interest may justify compensation of non-pecuniary damage. Not only the pain and suffering must be compensated into this concept. This is an old point of view that reduces the compensation of non pecuniary loss to "pretium doloris" and it was left behind, a long time ago, in the comparative law. Today, who has suffered has suffered personal injury; or injury to human dignity, liberty, or other personality rights, must be compensated for non pecuniary loss or damage too. It could also be the subject of compensation for persons having a close relationship with a victim suffering a fatal or very serious non-fatal injury.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barrientos Zamorano, E. M. (2008). Del daño moral al daño extrapatrimonial: La superación del pretium doloris. Revista Chilena de Derecho, 35(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34372008000100004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free