S121 Mandibular movement monitor for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnoea: clinical application

  • Alsaif S
  • Douglas W
  • Steier J
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction and Objectives Mandibular movement (MM) monitoring with automated analysis has been shown to be a convenient home diagnostic test for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), comparable to both in-lab and home polysomnography.1 2 We aimed to evaluate the performance of a MM monitoring system (Sunrise) against polygraphy in two UK clinical settings: a geographically dispersed region- Highlands of Scotland and a densely populated region- inner London. We present an interim analysis from this study (SOSAT trial; NCT05204004). Methods An ongoing prospective, randomised, blinded pilot study comparing MM monitoring and home polygraphy in adults undergoing investigation for suspected OSA. Forty patients will be recruited with a body mass index (BMI)>28kg/m2 and Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS)>12. Participants wear MM monitoring (Sunrise, Sunrise SA, Belgium) and polygraphy (Apnoealink- Air, ResMed, Australia) simultaneously overnight. MM analysis is automated; polygraphy is manually reviewed. Primary outcome of the SOSAT trial is time to treatment decision. Secondary outcomes include accuracy of MM monitoring and agreement of the treatment decisions based on each device. In this interim analysis we have compared the apnoea-hypopnoea indices (AHI) from both devices using Bland-Altman analysis. Results 17 participants have completed the trial to date, including one technical failure (both devices in the same participant). Data are, therefore, presented for n=16 participants (57% male, mean ± SD age 41.6 ± 9.7 years, BMI 39.2 ± 8.2 kg/m2, ESS 15.5 ± 3.8). Bland Altman analysis showed that MM monitoring underestimated AHI, compared to polygraphy (mean bias: -1.84 (95%CI -37.4 to +33.7) events/hour, figure 1). The variance was greater with higher AHIs (>15 events/hour). However, in 15 of 16 participants, the clinical treatment decision was the same irrespective of the diagnostic device used. Conclusions This interim analysis indicates that MM monitoring can be used for the clinical diagnosis of OSA. This novel diagnostic monitor could improve access to diagnosis in different geographical clinical settings.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alsaif, S., Douglas, W., Steier, J., Morrell, M., Polkey, M., & Kelly, J. (2022). S121 Mandibular movement monitor for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnoea: clinical application (p. A75.1-A75). BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2022-btsabstracts.127

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free