Adapting UML activity diagrams for mobile work process modelling: Experimental comparison of two notation alternatives

23Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Even if geographical aspects such as location is included in several enterprise architecture frameworks [15], enterprise modelling notations seldom capture the "where" aspect, such as the location for performing some activity in a business process. However, for mobile information systems it is often relevant to model where something is supposed to take place. In a previous paper, we suggested some alternatives for small modifications to UML Activity Diagrams to address this, but then only comparing the alternatives analytically. In this paper, we report on a controlled experiment comparing the two most promising notations from the previous paper, one adding location to the activity diagrams by annotations, another indicating location by colour. The experiment investigated both the participants' opinions about the notations and their performance on some tasks requiring understanding of the models. For opinion there was no significant difference, but for task performance there was a significant difference in favour of the notation using colour. © 2010 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gopalakrishnan, S., Krogstie, J., & Sindre, G. (2010). Adapting UML activity diagrams for mobile work process modelling: Experimental comparison of two notation alternatives. In Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (Vol. 68 LNBIP, pp. 145–161). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16782-9_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free