How number-space relationships are assessed before formal schooling: A taxonomy proposal

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The last years of research on numerical development have provided evidence that spatial-numerical associations (SNA) can be formed independent of formal school training. However, most of these studies used various experimental paradigms that referred to slightly different aspects of number and space processing. This poses a question of whether all SNAs described in the developmental literature can be interpreted as a unitary construct, or whether they are rather examples of different, but related phenomena. Our review aims to provide a starting point for a systematic classification of SNA measures used from infancy to late preschool years, and their underlying representations. We propose to distinguish among four basic SNA categories: (i) cross-dimensional magnitude processing, (ii) associations between spatial and numerical intervals, (iii) associations between cardinalities and spatial directions, (iv) associations between ordinalities and spatial directions. Such systematization allows for identifying similarities and differences between processes and representations that underlie the described measures, and also for assessing the adequacy of using different SNA tasks at different developmental stages. © 2014 Patro, Nuerk, Cress and Haman.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Patro, K., Nuerk, H. C., Cress, U., & Haman, M. (2014). How number-space relationships are assessed before formal schooling: A taxonomy proposal. Frontiers in Psychology. Frontiers Research Foundation. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00419

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free