Salinity effects on viability, metabolic activity and proliferation of three Perkinsus species

42Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Little is known regarding the range of conditions in which many Perkinsus species may proliferate, making it difficult to predict conditions favorable for their expansion, to identify conditions inducing mortality, or to identify instances of potential cross-infectivity among sympatric host species. In this study, the effects of salinity on viability, metabolic activity and proliferation of P. marinus, P. olseni and P. chesapeaki were determined. Specifically, this research examined the effects of 5 salinities (7, 11, 15, 25, 35‰), (1) without acclimation, on the viability and metabolic activity of 2 isolates of each Perkinsus species, and (2) with acclimation, on the viability, metabolic activity, size and number of 1 isolate of each species. P. chesapeaki showed the widest range of salinity tolerance of the 3 species, with high viability and cell proliferation at all salinities tested. Although P. chesapeaki originated from low salinity areas (i.e. <15‰), several measures (i.e. cell number and metabolic activity) indicated that higher salinities (15, 25‰) were more favorable for its growth. P. olseni, originating from high salinity areas, had better viability and proliferation at the higher salinities (15, 25, 35‰). Distinct differences in acute salinity response of the 2 P. olseni isolates at lower salinities (7, 11‰), however, suggest the need for a more expansive comparison of isolates to better define the lower salinity tolerance. Lastly, P. marinus was more tolerant of the lower salinities (7 and 11‰) than P. olseni, but exhibited reduced viability at 7‰, even after acclimation. © Inter-Research 2006.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

La Peyre, M., Casas, S., & La Peyre, J. (2006). Salinity effects on viability, metabolic activity and proliferation of three Perkinsus species. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, 71(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao071059

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free