Improving growth of infants with congenital heart disease using a consensus-based nutritional pathway

48Citations
Citations of this article
235Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: Infants with congenital heart disease (CHD) often experience growth failure prior to surgery, which is associated with increased paediatric-intensive-care unit length of stay (PICU-LOS) and post-operative complications. This study assessed the impact of a pre-operative, consensus-based nutritional pathway (including support from a multi-disciplinary team) on growth and clinical outcome. Design: Single-centre prospective pilot study. Setting: Tertiary paediatric cardiology surgical centre. Patients: Infants with CHD. Intervention: Infants with CHD were followed for up to 4-months-of-age before cardiac surgery and then to 12-months-of-age following the implementation of the consensus-based nutritional-pathway (Intervention group: November 2017–August 2018), with outcomes compared to a historic control group. The nutrition pathway involved a dietitian contacting parents of infants with the highest risk of growth failure weekly; reviewing weight gain and providing feeding support. Main outcome measure: Growth (weight-for-age, WAZ, and height-for-age-z-score, HAZ) at 4 and 12 months-of-age. Results: 44 infants in the intervention group were compared to 38 in the control group. Median (inter quartile range) change in WAZ from birth to 4 months-of-age (−0.9 (−1.5, 0.7)) and from birth to 12 months-of-age (−0.09 (−1.3, 1.1)) in the intervention group compared to the control group (−1.5 (−2.0, −0.4) (p = 0.04)) at 4 months-of age and at 12 months-of-age (−0.4 (1.9, 0.2) (p = 0.03)). HAZ at 4 months-of-age was −0.7 (−1.4, −0.1) vs. −1.0 (−1.9, −0.3) (p = 0.6) in the intervention and control groups respectively, and at 12 months-of-age HAZ was −0.7 (−1.9, −0.07) in the intervention group vs.-1.6 (−2.6, −0.4) in the control group (p = 0.04). Duration of PICU-LOS was 8.2 ± 11.6 days intervention vs. 18.3 ± 24.0 days control (p = 0.006). Conclusion: Overall weight was well maintained and growth improved in infants who followed the pre-operative nutritional-pathway. The duration of PICU-LOS was significantly lower in the intervention group, which may be due to improved nutritional status, although this requires further investigation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marino, L. V., Johnson, M. J., Davies, N. J., Kidd, C. S., Fienberg, J., Richens, T., … Darlington, A. S. E. (2020). Improving growth of infants with congenital heart disease using a consensus-based nutritional pathway. Clinical Nutrition, 39(8), 2455–2462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2019.10.031

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free