Statistics and animals in biomedical research

2Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A UK government-sponsored review1 has found that out of 271 randomly chosen papers reporting experiments on laboratory animals only 59% stated the objective of the study and the number of animals used. Most did not use randomisation or blinding, and only 70% of the publications that used statistical methods gave their methods and a measure of error. Michael Festing, one of the authors of the review, wants better statistics in animal experiments. © 2010 The Royal Statistical Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Festing, M. (2010). Statistics and animals in biomedical research. Significance, 7(4), 176–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2010.00459.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free