Tensions in mentoring medical students toward self-directed and reflective learning in a longitudinal portfolio-based mentoring system–An activity theory analysis

31Citations
Citations of this article
161Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: In medical education, students need to acquire skills to self-direct(ed) learning (SDL), to enable their development into self-directing and reflective professionals. This study addressed the mentor perspective on how processes in the mentor–student interaction influenced development of SDL. Methods:n = 22 mentors of a graduate-entry medical school with a problem-based curriculum and longitudinal mentoring system were interviewed (n = 1 recording failed). Using activity theory (AT) as a theoretical framework, thematic analysis was applied to the interview data to identify important themes. Results: Four themes emerged: centered around the role of the portfolio, guiding of students’ SDL in the context of assessment procedures, mentor-role boundaries and longitudinal development of skills by both the mentor and mentee. Application of AT showed that in the interactions between themes tensions or supportive factors could emerge for activities in the mentoring process. Conclusion: The mentors’ perspective on coaching and development of reflection and SDL of medical students yielded important insights into factors that can hinder or support students’ SDL, during a longitudinal mentor–student interaction. Coaching skills of the mentor, the interaction with a portfolio and the context of a mentor community are important factors in a longitudinal mentor–student interaction that can translate to students’ SDL skills.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Heeneman, S., & de Grave, W. (2017). Tensions in mentoring medical students toward self-directed and reflective learning in a longitudinal portfolio-based mentoring system–An activity theory analysis. Medical Teacher, 39(4), 368–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1286308

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free