Abstract
Context: Each country has a unique history in the development of its athletic training professionals and education and credentialing systems. In Japan, the majority of athletic trainers hold a domestic credential (JSPO-AT) obtained from the Japan Sport Association (JSPO) or a US-based credential from the Board of Certification (BOC-AT). Objective: To determine whether differences in demographic, professional, and educational characteristics exist between Japanese BOC-ATs and JSPO-ATs who currently practice athletic training services in Japan. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Online survey. Patients or Other Participants: Eight hundred twenty-nine Japanese athletic trainers in Japan (BOC-AT, n=64; JSPO-AT, n=765). (s): Pearson's Xsuperscript 2]test and Fisher's exact test were used to determine differences in demographic, professional, and educational characteristics between BOC-ATs and JSPO-ATs. Results: The proportion of female respondents was greater for BOC-ATs (29.7%) than for JSPO-ATs (18.7%; X[superscript 2] [1]=4.5, P=0.03). A greater proportion of BOC-ATs reported having master's degrees or higher (X[superscript 2] [3]=81.6, P[less than]0.01). The percentage of respondents with at least 1 therapist or medical practitioner license in Japan was greater for JSPO-ATs (73.1%) than for BOC-ATs (20.3%; P[less than] 0.01). The percentage of respondents with at least 1 credential in exercise, nutrition, or teaching was greater for BOC-ATs (62.5%) than for JSPO-ATs (45.2%; P[less than]0.01). A large difference was observed in the proportion of individuals who identified as therapists (JSPO-ATs= 29.8%, BOC-ATs=6.3%; X[superscript 2] [5]= 18.9, P[less than] 0.01). The median income for BOC-ATs was 401-600 million yen (US $36,500-$54,500), whereas the median income for JSPO-ATs was 0-200 million yen (US$0-$18,200). Conclusions: BOC-ATs in Japan were more established than JSPO-ATs as athletic training professionals with higher educational backgrounds, while more JSPO-ATs tended to be therapists. Findings from the current study may serve as benchmark data for the athletic training profession and service characteristics in Japan.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Izumi, H. “E,” & Hosokawa, Y. (2019). Athletic Training Services in Japan: A Comparison of the United States and Japan Based on Educational Background. Athletic Training Education Journal, 14(4), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.4085/1404305
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.