Comparison of perirectal versus rectal Swabs for detection of asymptomatic carriers of toxigenic clostridium difficile

18Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

For long-term care and spinal cord injury patients, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of perirectal versus rectal cultures for detection of asymptomatic carriers of Clostridium difficile were 95%, 100%, 100%, and 97%, respectively. Perirectal cultures provide an accurate method to detect asymptomatic carriers of C. difficile. Copyright © 2013, American Society for Microbiology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rogers, D. S., Kundrapu, S., Sunkesula, V. C. K., & Donskey, C. J. (2013). Comparison of perirectal versus rectal Swabs for detection of asymptomatic carriers of toxigenic clostridium difficile. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 51(10), 3421–3422. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01418-13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free