Automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator: When not to implant

1Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is the mainstay therapy for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction. Current indications for prophylactic ICD are based on the results of randomized controlled trials dating back to 15-20 years ago, which have usually enrolled highly selected patients with few comorbidities and only a small number of patients aged >75 years. Existing literature suggest an age-dependent attenuation of the efficacy of the ICD. Because of the ageing of the population, there is need for data addressing device efficacy among older patients that also considers the impact of geriatric syndromes on health status. The assessment of frailty may be of value in identifying elderly patients who may or may not benefit from ICD placement for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

la Rovere, M. T., & Traversi, E. (2020, January 21). Automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator: When not to implant. Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease. PAGEPress Publications. https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2020.1225

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free