Keeping flows separate: Good management practices in novel urban water systems derived from error analyses

4Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article examines the causes and addresses the prevention of unintended interconnections, particularly cross-connections, in novel urban water systems using the example of Qingdao, where a Resource Recovery Centre for the reuse of greywater and blackwater has been established for 12,000 inhabitants. With respect to cross-connections, this work incorporated both social-scientific and technical error analyses. The social-scientific error analysis systematically focused on the planning, implementation, and operational phases of the project. Organisational shortcomings were identified in four areas: (A) Coordination and consensus between the commissioned design institutes, (B) information in tenders, expertise, and awareness, (C) ownership by investors, and (D) time management. Based on empirical evidence, this article derives and discusses (eight) recommendations for good management, integrating technical and organisational measures aimed at preventing cross-connections. The pursuit of such measures is appropriate in order to prevent most types of misconnections-not just for the case under discussion, but for other novel urban water systems as well.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schramm, E., Ebert, B., Wang, B., Winker, M., & Zimmermann, M. (2019). Keeping flows separate: Good management practices in novel urban water systems derived from error analyses. Water (Switzerland), 11(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/w11122597

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free