Mortality among ischemic and nonischemic heart failure patients with a primary implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

3Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) for primary prevention is controversial in patients with nonischemic heart failure (HF). We evaluated the mortality and predictors of mortality in patients with prophylactic ICD implantation for ischemic and nonischemic HF. Methods: From 2008 to 2017, 1097 patients (667, nonischemic HF and 430, ischemic HF) who underwent prophylactic ICD implantation, were identified from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. We used propensity score overlap weighting to correct the differences between two groups. Results: Those with ischemic HF were older (67.0 ± 10.1 vs 61.8 ± 14.2 years), more often male (71.4% vs 63.7%), and had more comorbidities than patients with nonischemic HF. During a median follow-up of 37.3 months (interquartile range [IQR], 14.2-53.8 months), all-cause mortality was higher in unweighted patients with ischemic HF than in those with nonischemic HF (10.9 vs 6.4 per 100 person-years; hazard ratio [HR], 1.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-2.20; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yang, P. S., Kang, Y., Bae, H. J., Sung, J. H., Park, H. D., & Joung, B. (2021). Mortality among ischemic and nonischemic heart failure patients with a primary implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Journal of Arrhythmia, 37(6), 1537–1545. https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12651

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free