Impact of preconception weight loss on fasting glucose and pregnancy outcomes in women with obesity: A randomized trial

33Citations
Citations of this article
79Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: This study examined the effectiveness of a nonsurgical, preconception weight loss intervention on pregnancy outcomes in women with obesity. Methods: This was a two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. A total of 164 women with BMI 30 to 55 kg/m2 who were aged 18 to 38 years and planning pregnancy were randomized to a 12-week standard dietary intervention (SDI; n = 79) or a modified very low-energy diet (VLED; n = 85). Participants were observed for ≤48 weeks while trying for pregnancy and then during pregnancy. The primary outcome was maternal fasting plasma glucose at 26 to 28 weeks’ gestation. Exploratory outcomes were individual and composite obesity-related adverse pregnancy outcomes. Results: Weight loss was greater in the VLED group (SDI 3.2 [0.6] kg vs. VLED 13.0 [0.5] kg, p < 0.01). In completers who had a singleton live birth (SDI 22/79 vs. VLED 35/85, p = 0.10), there was no difference in fasting glucose at 26 to 28 weeks’ gestation (SDI 4.8[0.2] mmol/L vs. VLED 4.6 [0.1] mmol/L, p = 0.42). However, the composite of adverse pregnancy outcomes was significantly lower in the VLED group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Substantial prepregnancy weight loss in women with obesity does not alter fasting glucose at 26 to 28 weeks’ gestation but does reduce a composite of adverse pregnancy outcomes. A better understanding of metabolic changes in pregnancy after preconception weight loss may assist in improving maternal and neonatal health outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Price, S. A. L., Sumithran, P., Nankervis, A. J., Permezel, M., Prendergast, L. A., & Proietto, J. (2021). Impact of preconception weight loss on fasting glucose and pregnancy outcomes in women with obesity: A randomized trial. Obesity, 29(9), 1445–1457. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.23200

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free