Treatment of intermediate-risk prostate cancer with Cs-131: Long-term results from a single institution

1Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate our institutional outcomes utilizing Cs-131 prostate brachytherapy (PB) for the intermediate-risk (IR) group of prostate cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We reviewed a prospectively collected database of men treated with Cs-131 PB between 2006 and 2019. Patients with less than 24-months follow-up were excluded. Patients were classified as IR if they had one of the following factors: Gleason Score 7, prostate specific antigen >10 but <20 ng/mL, or T2b-c on clinical exam. We defined unfavorable-IR (UIR) as having either Grade Group 3, >1 IR factors, or ≥50% positive core biopsies. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate actuarial event-time probabilities for biochemical freedom from disease (BFD). RESULTS: A total of 335 patients with a median follow-up of 70.1 months (IQR 48.3–106.3 months) were identified. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was used in 7.2% of patients. Favorable-IR (FIR) patients were commonly treated with PB alone (91.8%). FIR patients who underwent PB alone had a 5-year BFD of 98.1%. UIR patients were commonly treated with external beam radiotherapy plus PB (61.2%). These patients had 5-year BFD of 91.1%. The 5-year BFD for UIR patients treated without ADT was 90.9%, whereas it was 95.0% among UIR patients treated with ADT (log-rank p = 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: FIR patients have excellent outcomes when treated with PB alone. External beam radiotherapy plus PB is a reasonable treatment approach for UIR patients. Future studies may elucidate which IR patients would benefit from treatment intensification.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rodríguez-López, J. L., Patel, A. K., Benoit, R. M., Beriwal, S., & Smith, R. P. (2022). Treatment of intermediate-risk prostate cancer with Cs-131: Long-term results from a single institution. Brachytherapy, 21(1), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2021.08.008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free