Measurement of joint effusion and haematoma formation by ultrasound in assessing the effectiveness of drains after total knee replacement: A prospective randomised study

38Citations
Citations of this article
78Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We prospectively randomised 78 patients into two groups, 'drains' or 'no drains' to assess the effectiveness of suction drains in reducing haematoma and effusion in the joint and its effect on wound healing after total knee replacement. Ultrasound was used to measure the formation of haematoma and effusion on the fourth post-operative day. This was a semiquantitative assessment of volume estimation. There was no difference in the mean effusion between the groups (5.91 mm in the drain group versus 6.08 mm in the no-drain, p = 0.82). The mean amount of haematoma in the no-drain group was greater (11.07 mm versus 8.41 mm, p = 0.03). However, this was not clinically significant judged by the lack of difference in the mean reduction in the post-operative haemoglobin between the groups (drain group 3.4 g/dl; no-drain group 3.0 g/dl, p = 0.38). There were no cases of wound infection or problems with wound healing at six weeks in any patient. Our findings indicate that drains do not reduce joint effusion but do reduce haematoma formation. They have no effect on wound healing. ©2010 British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Omonbude, D., El Masry, M. A., O’Connor, P. J., Grainger, A. J., Allgar, V. L., & Calder, S. J. (2010). Measurement of joint effusion and haematoma formation by ultrasound in assessing the effectiveness of drains after total knee replacement: A prospective randomised study. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B, 92(1), 51–55. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B1.22121

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free