Efficacy of nedocromil 2% versus fluorometholone 0.1%: A randomised, double masked trial comparing the effects on severe vernal keratoconjunctivitis

25Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aims - To compare the efficacy of topical nedocromil 2% with fluorometholone 0.1% in vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC). Methods - In a double masked random design, 24 patients with severe vernal keratoconjunctivitis were placed at random on nedocromil 2% eye drops in one eye and fluorometholone 0.1% in the fellow eye. At the end of the 2 week treatment period, the patient crossed over the eye drops (if asymptomatic in one eye), or continued with nedocromil sodium in both eyes (if asymptomatic in both eyes). All patients were examined weekly and ocular surface temperature recorded for a period of 6 weeks. Results - Improvement in the watering, discharge, conjunctival hyperaemia, papillary hypertrophy, and Trantas' dots was noted in both groups, but overall fluorometholone was significantly more effective than nedocromil. Eyes treated with fluorometholone showed a significant decrease in ocular surface temperature compared with nedocromil treated eyes (p = 0.03). Conclusions - Both nedocromil and fluorometholone were effective in ameliorating the signs and symptoms of vernal keratoconjunctivitis. No adverse effects were noted in the nedocromil group.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tabbara, K. F., & Al-Kharashi, S. A. (1999). Efficacy of nedocromil 2% versus fluorometholone 0.1%: A randomised, double masked trial comparing the effects on severe vernal keratoconjunctivitis. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 83(2), 180–184. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.83.2.180

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free