Abstract
Objective To compare pathological characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival in patients with ductal adenocarcinoma (DC) compared to those with acinar adenocarcinoma (AC). Materials and Methods Using the National Cancer Database, we identified patients diagnosed with clinically localized (cN0, cM0) pure DC (n = 1328) and AC (n = 751,635) between 1998 and 2011. High-risk AC was defined as Gleason 8-10. Demographic, treatment, pathological, and survival characteristics of patients were compared. Results Compared to patients with Gleason 8-10 AC, those with DC presented with lower mean prostate-specific antigen (10.3 vs 16.2 ng/mL, P
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Packiam, V. T., Patel, S. G., Pariser, J. J., Richards, K. A., Weiner, A. B., Paner, G. P., … Eggener, S. E. (2015). Contemporary Population-Based Comparison of Localized Ductal Adenocarcinoma and High-Risk Acinar Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate. Urology, 86(4), 777–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.07.009
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.