Hemicrania continua: major shortcomings in the new classification

4Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Hemicrania continua (HC) was described and coined by Sjaastad and Spierings in 1984. Later cases, carrying this appellation should, grossly, conform to this original description. The proposed classification criteria (ICHD, 3rd edition beta version) for HC has major shortcomings, and ordinary HC cases do not fulfill the proposed criteria. Relatively rare symptoms and signs are e.g. made obligatory (point C 1).And the recommended dosage of indomethacin- both test and long-term dosages-is unallowably high. In this way, bogus HC cases are systematically created. This irrational diagnostic system is in urgent need of a major revision.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fredriksen, T. A., Antonaci, F., & Sjaastad, O. (2014). Hemicrania continua: major shortcomings in the new classification. Journal of Headache and Pain. Springer-Verlag Italia s.r.l. https://doi.org/10.1186/1129-2377-15-61

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free