Abstract
This article considers the potentially untapped significance of the Bolitho test, while the Bolam test looks to be facing a challenging twilight. It re-examines the landmark House of Lords case of Nadyne Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board, having regard for Bolam as modified by Bolitho. Although further jurisprudential Bolam challenge is likely in the wake of the Montgomery ruling, there are grounds for re-examining Bolitho, on its own merits.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Buttigieg, G. G. (2018). Re-visiting Bolam and Bolitho in the light of Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board. The Medico-Legal Journal, 86(1), 42–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0025817217727218
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.