Re-visiting Bolam and Bolitho in the light of Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board

2Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article considers the potentially untapped significance of the Bolitho test, while the Bolam test looks to be facing a challenging twilight. It re-examines the landmark House of Lords case of Nadyne Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board, having regard for Bolam as modified by Bolitho. Although further jurisprudential Bolam challenge is likely in the wake of the Montgomery ruling, there are grounds for re-examining Bolitho, on its own merits.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Buttigieg, G. G. (2018). Re-visiting Bolam and Bolitho in the light of Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board. The Medico-Legal Journal, 86(1), 42–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0025817217727218

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free